Archive for the ‘Blogging’ Category

Who Is In Your VAN (Value Added Network)?

Tuesday, September 15th, 2009
Swedish Mini van
Image by MGSpiller via Flickr

Who is in your VAN?

No, I am not talking your grocery-getter mini-van, or your creepy stalker van, or any other gasoline powered vehicle of the boxy van type. I am talking about your Value Added Network. Say what?

We seem to spend so much time these days building networks of all types. Whether it is a computer network, a social network, a family network or what ever type of network – we are fervently trying to connect all the various pieces of our lives together. The people, the places, the things, the ideas – trying to connect it, make sense of it and build our lives from it.

Maybe, just maybe, in our quest to build our networks – online, offline, within social circles and outside the social sphere of our lives we have failed to cue into what should be the most important part of our network – our Value Added Network. So, what exactly is a Value Added Network? I will explain my view of it below.

Value Added Network – the portion of our network that we either directly receive value from, or directly provide value to.

That’s a pretty broad definition if you ask me, so let’s break it down a bit. In any given network we possess, use or a part of, there are any given number of nodes, people, places, things or ideas. These nodes, people, places, things and ideas all have the ability to either give, take or destroy value to our network. This can happen any number of ways – which I might explore in another post later – but will touch on here.

Let’s examine the three things that can happen. Give – this does not mean a physical object, material object, or even any object at all. We can receive value from our network in many forms. We might get an uplifting note on a day we are struggling, which is good because it may improve our outlook and allow us to do something spectacular that day. We might get a small bonus or token from a client, customer or friend…just something to let us know we matter. We might get help from someone on a project, maybe an idea from them that helps us solve a problem. We might setup a new connection that we find is a wealth of information that we can personally apply to our activities and enrich those around and give back. Speaking of giving – we must do our part back to our network. If you can give an encouraging word, do so. If you can give some ideas, help or other resources, do so. Likewise maybe you can give someone an object, something material or whatever that enriches their life within their network, and within yours since they are a part of it.

Taking – yes there are those items, people and places that simply take and never provide any value back. We do have to be careful of these. Why? Sometimes it is wonderful to give, have it taken and not have any expectations in return. However, sometimes people, places and things simply take all they can, and we willingly give all we can and run to the ragged edge because of it. How? Take the highly addictive games we play on our computers. How many hours can we spend doing that? At what point to we cross the boundary and it becomes a time waster? What about the days we spend several hours doing activities that take away from things we really should be doing? Maybe we spend 2 hours being sidetracked on a web site, in a store, driving aimlessly when we really need direction. See how it can run our network dry? Sometimes we become the taker – simply consuming the people, places, things and ideas around us – needlessly, endlessly, ferociously, and selfishly. If you find your self doing this – STOP. It will better your network and those whose network you are drying up.

Destruction. It happens to us all. Those things which simply have no good outcome. There are things in our networks out to destroy out networks – whether it is a person, a piece of equipment, a place – they are there. The sole purpose is to disrupt as much as possible. If it is a person, it might be jealousy, anger, hate or malice that is driving this destruction. If it is something, say a computer or office equipment, maybe it is old and needs replaced, maybe it is malfunctioning, maybe it was no good to begin with. Either way, this destruction can not only destroy and dwindle our networks, but also destroy and dwindle ourselves.

So what is a VAN? A value added network is ensuring that what we spend the most amount of time with in any of our given networks is that which provides a harmonious balance between giving, receiving and realization that we can each give and take as much as it takes if we have built the proper network of people, places, things and ideas. It is merely the idea that we want to give and take, and get rid of that which is not balanced – if we are taking too much, out to destroy or not giving enough and are out of balance, we have a limited value from our network. If those items in our network are taking too much, out to destroy or not giving enough, again it is a limited value network. However, when we can find that balance, we have our value added network – the proper balance of give and take…whether it is interaction with people, places, things or ideas – they all can effect our network equally, just as we can equally effect them.

Your thoughts? Have you evaluated your networks recently? What did you find? Did you find any of the things discussed? Do you agree or disagree with the analogy? Share below in the comments!!

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

New Theme Launched

Saturday, April 11th, 2009

Just put up a new theme on the blog. It’s my first customization attempt at a WordPress theme. Let me know what you think! I tried to keep it clean and simple, much better readability I think than the old black background with white text theme I had.

I do still have some items to change and tweak up, but that’s okay. I had to publish it at this point, or else it probably never would get done – at least only having a few tweaks left will motivate me to get them done since it is now live.

The Rules Of Social Media

Friday, March 13th, 2009

I am the farthest person away from being a Social Media Expert/Maven/Authority/SuperStar/RockStar/InsertClicheTitleHere type of person. I am however, a Social Media User. I use various tools, just like everyone else does. I follow and have interacted with some of the best minds out there, and some of the worst minds out there on this topic.

Rules? We Don’t Need Stinking Rules
One common trend is people trying to define the Rules of Social Media. That’s funny. Do you know why? There are none. What works for you, may not work for me. What works for Skittles (or doesn’t) may or may not work for Milky Way. Get over it. Move on.

My Social Media Rules
What? You just said no rules. I know – be quiet now and listen.

  1. Connect
  2. Communicate
  3. Be Real
  4. Be Transparent

Pretty simple.

Explanation For Those That Need It
Connect to people, customers, clients, friends and family which are, by definition, all human capital. They are PEOPLE, Businesses ARE people. Human Capital = PEOPLE. You can’t use the tools if you don’t connect.

Communicate with the aforementioned list of people. Communicate in a TWO-WAY fashion – you must LISTEN to be a great communicator – even in Social Media.

Be real with the aforementioned list of people. If you are not being real to who you are, who your business is, you are killing your chances of success. Seriously. Of all the Internet tools, social media seems to be best at identifying failures by individuals and businesses merely trying to broadcast, exploit or make a quick buck by NOT being real and genuine.

Be transparent with aforementioned list of people. Transparency ensures success with being real. If something is paid – a blog post, a tweet, a comment – it doesn’t matter what, DISCLOSE that fact up front. If you work for a company and do things on their behalf, DISCLOSE that fact up front….and if said business doesn’t want you to – evaluate WHY they don’t and evaluate if you should still be interacting with them. Gimmicks, trickery, lies, and shadiness DO NOT work with Social Media.

There, rules from the most NON expert on Social Media. Rules that aren’t rules, but principles. Things that if we do right, I PERSONALLY feel success will be within reach on Social Media whether you are an individual, a business or an individual acting on behalf of a business. I would think it would work for Government, Education and Non-Profit as well. In fact, I bet these four “principles” would work no matter who you are representing using Social Media.

What do you think?

A Different Kind Of Contest

Friday, March 6th, 2009

So I was thinking about this about a month ago. oDesk on Twitter is partially responsible for the answer to a question I had: What kind of prize should I give out for Akismet blocking the 2000th spam comment on my blog. oDesk made the suggestion for a can of spam.

I will go one further – to anyone who leaves a comment, and no SPAM comments DO NOT count :-) , on this post, follows me on Twitter from Friday March 06, 2008 or interacts on Twitter with an @reply to me will automatically be entered to win. The day I Akismet blocks the 2000th spam comment, I will randomly pick a winner from all and notify them appropriately. Also I will post a blog post/comment and Tweet out the winner.

What’s that prize? One lovely can of SPAM and to go along with it one lovely can of Crushed Pineapple. I will, of course, pay for shipping to the winner.

And hey, if you do not like either one, drop them off at a food donation location. Personally I grew up eating baked SPAM with pineapple on top and still enjoy it on occasion because it is ROOTS food….the kind that brings back a fond memory from somewhere in a time of being a kid.

<<----UPDATE---->>

Danny Brown (@dannybrown)is a genius. His comment of giving the prize to the local food bank spurred a thought. So the prize for the winner stays the same – 1 can of Spam and 1 can of pineapple (If you choose not to accept the prize, they will go to the local food bank). HOWEVER – for each entry (comment here, folllow me on Twitter or @reply to me on Twitter) 1 canned good will be donated to the local food bank here in Pueblo, Colorado.

The low down – yes, you can only enter once. Danny asked via Twitter if he got two entries for @replying and leaving a comment – I told him he just doubled his chances – but really only one entry per person. The drawing will be very scientific – no really it will be – I will simply create an internal database with the name of the commenter or twitter user, and do a script to randomly generate a number between 1 and the total number of entries received. Then, which ever record matches the random number, wins. The true winner? The local food bank.

<<----UPDATE---->>

The contest has now ended – I will be publishing the results the 1st or 2nd week of April as to the winner of the can of spam and pineapple as well as total number of entries received, which equals total number of canned goods donated to the local food bank.

Why I Gave Up: Quantity vs. Quality

Tuesday, February 17th, 2009

A while back, I started posting a book each day, with a link back to Amazon for the book. I didn’t do it very long. Why? There really was no value in it for you. Yes, part of it was associate links – just trying to get a bit of monetizing going on. But the other aspect was, I thought it might help the readers I have.

Instead I started getting more posts, but no quality. So I gave up on it. Smart move in my view. I wish to create some form of positive value for those that come along this blog – and that just wasn’t accomplishing it for them. Nor for me.

It’s about quality, not quantity in many realms – this one seems to be one of the most classic applications of that mantra. Blogging, Twitter and truly social media as a whole seems to have two camps: Those focused on quantity and those focused on quality. There are a few who accomplish both…they are the kingpins of social media so to say. They consistently produce thought provoking content, interact with a large number of people and do both at an astonishing rate. Then there are those who create tons of content, but nothing that jumps off the screen if you will and generates readership.

What about you – do you focus on quality or quantity in your content creation, social interaction and general day-to-day activities?

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

View in: Mobile | Standard